6 Comments
User's avatar
Detroit Cineaste's avatar

You're saying that Eggers changed the names of the characters to avoid being sued. Isn't Stoker's novel public domain?

Expand full comment
Travis Earl's avatar

The original Nosferatu was actually a Dracula knockoff. They changed the name to avoid being sued by the Stoker estate (it’s so old it was made 10 years after Stoker’s death). That’s what Scott is referring to.

Expand full comment
Scott Mendelson's avatar

Bless you for answering that in my absence.

Expand full comment
Travis Earl's avatar

For me it’s all about the castle sequence. I reread the opening part of Dracula pretty well annually and that sequence is a what made it a classic. I’ll love it regardless (like ive been saying some event last month broke my brain and sent me into horror mode - cant put my finger on what it was though) but I’m with you on the Bram Stoker’s comparison. When I saw the shadow hand creeping over the city I was a little deflated since I was expecting Orlock like we’ve never seen before instead of a Bram Stoker’s update. Especially from Eggers.

Expand full comment
Brian's avatar

I just need Nosferatu to be better than Coppola's disaster (not a high bar). My son and I recently watched the Herzog version at Alamo Drafthouse (I saw it in 1979, too). Looking forward to the new one. Seeing it on the 29th.

Expand full comment
Travis Earl's avatar

My expectations are very high. The original and Herzog’s rank high in my top ten greatest horror movies ever made. It has a lot to live up to.

Expand full comment